Schwarzmann v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| Timothy Schwarzmann |
| Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO |
| 1:2021cv02270 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney James E. Miller for Timothy Schwarzmann. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #7 ). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/5/2022.(P,K)
|
|
Order [non-document]granting Plaintiff's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Gregg C. Greenberg for Timothy Schwarzmann. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #6 ). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/5/2022.(P,K)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for attorney James E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11187427, filed by Plaintiff Timothy Schwarzmann. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of James Miller)(Perlmuter, Scott) |
| Filing 6 Motion for attorney Gregg C. Greenberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11187426, filed by Plaintiff Timothy Schwarzmann. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing of Gregg Greenberg)(Perlmuter, Scott) |
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Timothy Schwarzmann. Government Employees Insurance Company waiver sent on 12/3/2021, answer due 2/1/2022 filed on behalf of Timothy Schwarzmann (Greenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Andrew J. Cleves filed by on behalf of Government Employees Insurance Company. (Cleves, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Brian J. Kelly filed by on behalf of Government Employees Insurance Company. (Kelly, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Counsel for service upon Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,Ja) |
| Filing 1 Class Action and Collective Action Complaint with jury demand against Government Employees Insurance Company. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11160804, filed by Timothy Schwarzmann. (Attachments: #1 Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons). (Perlmuter, Scott) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,Ja) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,Ja) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
