Cooke v. Fender
Petitioner: Dietrick S. Cooke
Respondent: Douglas Fender and Warden Douglas Fender
Case Number: 1:2021cv02283
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Patricia A Gaughan
Referring Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Hilda Rosenberg filed by on behalf of Douglas Fender. (Rosenberg, Hilda)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order: A petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 has been filed in this Court. The Court, having examined the petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2254 cases, cannot determine from the face of the petition that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, (1) Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. The answer shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, and shall address all legal issues raised in the petition. (2) Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of respondent's answer to respond thereto. (3) Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of petitioner's reply brief to respond thereto. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/14/21. (LC,S) re #1
December 14, 2021 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/14/21. (LC,S)
December 14, 2021 Copies of #3 and Automatic Reference of Administrative Action mailed to Dietrick S. Cooke #A763-148 at Lake Erie Correctional Institution, 501 Thompson Road, Conneaut, OH 44030 and to Warden Douglas Fender at Lake Erie Correctional Institution, 501 Thompson Road, Conneaut, OH 44030 and emailed to Attorney General's Office on 12/14/21. (LC,S)
December 3, 2021 Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,Ja)
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid. $5.00. Receipt # 14660135514. Filed by Dietrick S. Cooke. (Attachments: #1 Case Designation Sheet, #2 Potential Summons) (L,Ja)
December 3, 2021 Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (L,Ja)
December 3, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (L,Ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cooke v. Fender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dietrick S. Cooke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Douglas Fender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Douglas Fender
Represented By: Hilda Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?