Frazier et al v. Multilink, Inc.
| Donald Frazier and Jennifer Taylor |
| Multilink, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv02407 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| David A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Multilink, Inc. waiver sent 2/21/22, answer due 4/22/22 filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Levine, Bradley) |
| Case reassigned to District Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to General Order 2022-03. (S,HR) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Multilink, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (V,AR) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Multilink, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11196037. Filed by Donald Frazier and Jennifer Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Defendant Multilink, Inc.) (Levine, Bradley) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (V,AR) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (V,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
