Map to Health d/b/a Recovery Unplugged v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
| MAP TO HEALTH d/b/a Recovery Unplugged |
| AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation, PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc, The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Richard Sackler, Beverly Sackler, David Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe Sackler, John Stewart, Mark Timney, Craig Landau, Russell Gasdia, Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Theresa Sackler, TEVA PHARMACEUTCAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,, Cephalon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SpecGX LLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco, Inc., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.,, ENDO PHARMACEUTIALS INC., Insys Therapeutics Inc., ALLERGAN PLC, f/k/a ACTAVIS PLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., n/k/a Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., ACTAVIS LLC,, Actavis Pharma, Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., MALLINCKRODT PLC,, Mallinckrodt LLC, CVS Health Corporation, The Kroger Co., RITE AID OF MARYLAND, INC,, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Anda, Inc., H.D. Smith, LLC f/k/a H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co., Henry Schein, Inc., DEPOMED, INC., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Wal-Mart Inc. and Does 1-100 |
| 1:2021op45093 |
| July 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
| P.I.: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) (Abbott Defendants) filed by MAP TO HEALTH d/b/a Recovery Unplugged. (Eaves, John) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against ACTAVIS LLC,, ALLERGAN PLC, f/k/a ACTAVIS PLC, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Anda, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., DEPOMED, INC., Does 1-100, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.,, ENDO PHARMACEUTIALS INC., Russell Gasdia, H.D. Smith, LLC f/k/a H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co., Henry Schein, Inc., Insys Therapeutics Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Craig Landau, MALLINCKRODT PLC,, Mallinckrodt LLC, McKesson Corporation, Noramco, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc, RITE AID OF MARYLAND, INC,, Beverly Sackler, David Sackler, Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe Sackler, Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Richard Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, SpecGX LLC, John Stewart, TEVA PHARMACEUTCAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,, The Kroger Co., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Mark Timney, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., n/k/a Actavis, Inc., Wal-Mart Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10934334. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action MDL 2804. Filed by MAP TO HEALTH d/b/a Recovery Unplugged. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 RICO Statement) (Eaves, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
