Cedeno v. Friedman et al
| Noel Cedeno |
| Stuart A Friedman, Ronnie Ducoff, Timothy J. McGinty, Jose Villanueva, Scott Zarczylic, Bill Mason, Michael Astrab, Mary Anne Reese, John A. Vavra, Tabatha Alvarez, Oscar Rodriguez, Jeffrey M. Gamso, Joseph V. Pagano, Elain C. Evans and Charli Santiago Feliciano |
| 1:2022cv00046 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Noel Cedeno. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Noel Cedeno, #2 Request for Certified Account Statement and Acknowledgement of Understanding, #3 Inmate Demand Statement, #4 Envelope). (R,AP)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Noel Cedeno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285, #4 Miscellaneous State Court Documents and Transcripts, #5 Envelope). (R,AP)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (R,AP)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (R,AP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
