Aerodyne Environmental, Inc. v. Keirton, Inc. et al
| Aerodyne Environmental, Inc. |
| Keirton, Inc. and Keirton, USA Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00118 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Counsel for service upon All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Aerodyne Environmental, Inc. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid. $402.. Receipt # 14660136455. Filed by Aerodyne Environmental, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A 9/13/2018 Letter, #2 Exhibit B 10/22/2018 10/22/2018 Emails, #3 Exhibit C 10/18/2018 Email, #4 Exhibit D 9/26/2019 Email, #5 Exhibit F 11/6/2019 Email, #6 Exhibit G Confidentiality Agreement, #7 Exhibit G Confidentiality Agreement, #8 Exhibit I 12/7/2021 Email, #9 Exhibit J Placeholder, #10 Exhibit K 12/22/2021 Letter, #11 Case Designation, #12 Summons, #13 Summons) (L,Ja)
|
|
Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (L,Ja)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,Ja)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
