Marcellus v. Franklin Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jason C. Marcellus
Defendant: Franklin Service, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00170
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order of Dismissal. The Court has been advised by counsel of record that the case has been settled. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs, except as otherwise provided through settlement. The Court retains jurisdiction to ensure that the settlement agreement is executed. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 3/28/2022. (K,K)
March 25, 2022 Minutes of proceedings [non-document] On March 25, 2022, the Court conducted a follow-up telephone conference attended by plaintiff's counsel, Marwan R. Daher, and defendant's counsel, Boyd Gentry. The Court inquired into the parties' progress in resolving this dispute and provided a suggested settlement amount. Defendant's counsel is directed to provide the suggested settlement amount to his client and inform the Court whether the matter has been settled via email to the law clerk (jacqueline_meesemartinez@ohnd.uscourts.gov). Nothing further was scheduled. (Court Reporter: n/a.) Time: 12 minutes. (K,K)
March 23, 2022 Minutes of proceedings [non-document] On March 23, 2022, the Court conducted a telephone conference attended by plaintiff's counsel, Marwan R. Daher, and defendant's counsel, Boyd Gentry. The Court inquired into the parties' progress in resolving this dispute and directed them to obtain any necessary discovery in the next couple of days. The Court scheduled a follow-up telephone conference for 2:30 p.m. on March 25, 2022 to ensure that the matter is quickly resolved. (Court Reporter: n/a.) Time: 15 minutes. (K,K)
March 21, 2022 Filing 8 Joint Status Report filed by Jason C. Marcellus. (Daher, Marwan)
March 21, 2022 Notice [non-document] Status Conference reset for 3/23/2022 at 01:00 PM to be held telephonically before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. The parties are directed to file a joint status report no later than 12 p.m. (noon) on March 22, 2022. (K,K)
March 12, 2022 Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Boyd W. Gentry filed by on behalf of Franklin Service, Inc.. (Gentry, Boyd)
February 24, 2022 Filing 6 Affidavit of Service executed upon Franklin Service, Inc. on 2/16/2022, filed on behalf of Jason C. Marcellus (Daher, Marwan)
February 23, 2022 Minutes of proceedings [non-document] On February 23, 2022, the Court conducted a telephonic Status Conference attended by Plaintiffs counsel, Marwan R. Daher, and Defendant's counsel, Rick Culp. The Court inquired into the Plaintiff's claims and the Defendant's denial of the allegations. The Court recommended settling the dispute and ordered a preliminary exchange of documents so both parties may assess the viability of their respective positions. The parties agreed to attempt resolving this matter independently, and the Court scheduled a follow-up telephonic status conference for 10:00 a.m. on March 25, 2022, to check in on the status of the document exchange and the settlement negotiations. A joint status report is due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) on March 23, 2022. (Court Reporter: n/a.) Time: 12 minutes. (K,K)
February 22, 2022 Notice [non-document] of Telephone Conference set for 2/23/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. (K,K)
January 31, 2022 Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Franklin Service, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (V,AR)
January 31, 2022 Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Omar T. Sulaiman filed by on behalf of Jason C. Marcellus. (Sulaiman, Omar)
January 31, 2022 Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Mohammed O. Badwan filed by on behalf of Jason C. Marcellus. (Badwan, Mohammed)
January 31, 2022 Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by Marwan R. Daher filed by on behalf of Jason C. Marcellus. (Daher, Marwan)
January 31, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Franklin Service, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11247823. Filed by Jason C. Marcellus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Daher, Marwan)
January 31, 2022 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (V,AR)
January 31, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (V,AR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcellus v. Franklin Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason C. Marcellus
Represented By: Mohammed O. Badwan
Represented By: Omar T. Sulaiman
Represented By: Marwan R. Daher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin Service, Inc.
Represented By: Boyd W. Gentry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?