Barham v. Rent-A-Daughter Corp., et al
Venita Barham |
Rent-A-daughter, Glatley, Nadine, Rent-A-Daughter Corp., Rent-A-Daughter LLC and Nadine Glatley |
1:2022cv00338 |
March 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Charles Esque Fleming |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Defendant's Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Nadine Glatley, Rent-A-Daughter Corp., Rent-A-Daughter LLC. (Neumeyer, Ryan) |
Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed, waivers sent 3/2/22, answers due 5/2/22 filed on behalf of Venita Barham (Hamilton, Amy) Modified text on 4/19/2022 (S,SR). |
Case reassigned to District Judge Charles E. Fleming pursuant to General Order 2022-07. (D,Ju) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided, and were not issued. (L,MI) |
Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI) |
Filing 1 Complaint for violations of the fair labor standards act and ohio law with jury demand against Rent-A-daughter, Rent-A-Daughter LLC, Nadine Glatley. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11295860. Filed by Venita Barham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Hamilton, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.