Bolden v. Fuerst et al
Plaintiff: Fredrick Bolden
Defendant: Nancy A. Fuerst, Eric James Ivey and Kenneth F Kochevar
Case Number: 1:2022cv00377
Filed: March 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Nancy A. Fuerst, Eric James Ivey, Kenneth F Kochevar. (Shafer, Leslie)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Nancy A. Fuerst, Eric James Ivey, Kenneth F Kochevar. (Shafer, Leslie)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Copy of non-doc Order mailed to Fredrick Bolden at 14100 Terrace Rd., Apt 360 Cleveland, OH 44112 on 3/10/2022. (P,K)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] The Court observes that the Complaint (Doc. No. #1 ) contains the personal addresses of certain public officials. The Court has restricted the Complaint to be accessible only to court users and the instant parties. Should the defendants wish to seek further relief, the defendants are directed to file a written motion. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/10/2022. (P,K)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Fredrick Bolden. (H,Ch) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/9/2022: #1 Corrected Motion) (H,Ch)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Fredrick Bolden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Results of Global Affidavit Survey, #3 Affidavit of Fredrick Bolden) (H,Ch)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (H,Ch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bolden v. Fuerst et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fredrick Bolden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Fuerst
Represented By: Leslie J. Shafer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric James Ivey
Represented By: Leslie J. Shafer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth F Kochevar
Represented By: Leslie J. Shafer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?