Unger Company, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
| Unger Company, Inc. |
| Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. |
| 1:2022cv00491 |
| March 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Certified copy of Order of Remand and docket sheet mailed to Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas with acknowledgment of receipt enclosed. Related document(s) #12 . (S,HR) |
| Filing 13 Judgment Entry Terminating Case. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 5/10/2022. (Y,A) |
Filing 12
Order: The Court REMANDS the case to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 5/10/2022. (Y,A)
|
|
Order [non-document]: granting Defendant's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Sarah D. Gordon for Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (ECF No. #9 ). Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 4/28/2022.(Y,A)
|
|
Order [non-document]: granting Defendant's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Erica Gerson for Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (ECF No. #10 ). Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 4/28/2022.(Y,A)
|
|
Order [non-document]: granting Defendant's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Cara A. Lawson for Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (ECF No. #11 ). Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 4/28/2022.(Y,A)
|
| Filing 11 Motion for attorney Cara A. Lawson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11393697, filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Cara A. Lawson, Esq.)(Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 10 Motion for attorney Erica Gerson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11393688, filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Erica Gerson, Esq.)(Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 9 Motion for attorney Sarah D. Gordon to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11393648, filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Sarah D. Gordon, Esq.)(Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Unger Company, Inc.. (Hilkert, David) |
| Notice by Clerk that Unger Company, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (H,SP) |
| Filing 7 Motion for judgment on the pleadings with memorandum in support filed by Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Insurance Policy) (Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 6 Answer to Complaint filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 5 Motion to remand case filed by Plaintiff Unger Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Hilkert, David) |
|
Order [non-document]: Defendant's motion for an extension to April 19, 2022 to answer, move, or otherwise plead in response to the complaint is unopposed and granted. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 4/4/2022. (Y,A)
|
| Filing 4 Joint Proposed Stipulation filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,HR) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.. (Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV-22-959883 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11345010. Filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2, Insurance Policy, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lloyd, Katheryn) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (S,HR) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (S,HR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
