Willis v. May
| Courtney Willis |
| Warden Harold May |
| 1:2022cv00625 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Judgment Entry. For the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order (Doc. #4 ) issued this date, the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court finds, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Judge John R. Adams on 06/06/2022. (M,TL)
|
|
Filing 4
Opinion and Order. For the reason set forth in this Opinion and Order, Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. #2 ) is granted. Willis' Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court finds, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge John R. Adams on 06/06/2022. (M,TL)
|
|
Copy of #5 Judgment and #4 Memorandum Opinion and Order mailed to Courtney Willis #750-817, Toledo Correctional Facility, 2001 East Central Ave., Toledo, OH 43608 on 06/07/2022. (M,TL)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Courtney Willis. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Demand Statement)(M,TL)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP, filed by Courtney Willis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Various Court Documents, #3 Envelope) (M,TL)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (M,TL)
|
|
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) and #3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order mailed to Courtney Willis #750-817, Toledo Correctional Facility, 2001 East Central Ave., Toledo, OH 43608 on 04/20/2022. (M,TL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Willis v. May | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Courtney Willis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Harold May | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
