King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Karl L. King |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons and Israel Jacquez |
| 1:2022cv00713 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Motion to dismiss case without prejudice, and Motion for required information needed to file legal malpractice claim filed by Petitioner Karl L. King. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(S,HR)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order; Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse); Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 5/18/2022. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 2
Order: Upon consideration, and pursuant to LR 72.2 et seq., this matter is referred for report and recommended decision to United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker, which referral shall include the issuance by the Magistrate Judge of any order requiring the respondent to answer, service of the petition or any appropriate order directed to this matter, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing Habeas Corpus cases. LR 72.1(f). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/18/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), and #3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order, mailed to Michelle M. Baeppler, Acting U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Ohio, 801 W. Superior Ave, Suite 400, Cleveland OH 44113, and Israel Jacquez, Warden, FDC SeaTac, P.O. Box 13901, Seattle, WA 98198, and United States Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001 on 5/18/2022. Copy of #3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order, mailed to Karl L. King #18798-051, FDC SeaTac, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 13900, Seattle, WA 98198 on 5/18/2022. (D,JJ)
|
|
Copy of 5/18/2022 order mailed to Karl L. King #18798-051 at SEATAC Federal Detention Center Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 13900 Seattle, WA 98198 on 5/18/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) against Federal Bureau of Prisons and Israel Jacquez, Warden. Filing fee paid. $5.00. Receipt # 14660138384. Filed by Karl L. King. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Title 18 Sentencing Guidelines, #3 2-28-2022 Letter, #4 3-22-2022 Letter, #5 2-24-2022 Letter, #6 2-17-2022 Letter, #7 Individualized Needs Plan, #8 1-12-2022 Order of Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael J. Holbrook, #9 Cover Letter, #10 Envelope). (H,Ch)
|
|
Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (H,Ch)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (H,Ch)
|
|
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and a blank civil cover sheet mailed to Karl L. King (#18798-051) at SeaTac Federal Detention Center, P.O. Box 13900, Seattle, WA 98198. Related document(s) #1 . (H,Ch)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
