Hardymon v. Kent et al
Shane J Hardymon and Shane J. Hardymon |
Sheriff Scott M. Kent, Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio, Sergeant Tyson Estrada, Deputy Brandon M.A. Cottrill, Deputy Cory J. Geyer, Deputy Daniel J Williamson, Administrator Kent Rachel, John/Jane Does and Daniel J. Williamson |
1:2022cv00724 |
May 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Solomon Oliver |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Answer to #3 Amended complaint filed by Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio, Brandon M.A. Cottrill, Tyson Estrada, Cory J. Geyer, Scott M. Kent, Kent Rachel, Daniel J. Williamson. (Schoolcraft, Stephanie) |
Filing 13 Attorney Appearance of Shane Hardymon as co-counsel filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon. (Copeland, Billi) |
Filing 12 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Daniel J. Williamson waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022 filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 11 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Kent Rachel waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022, filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 10 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Tyson Estrada waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022, filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 9 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Scott M. Kent waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022, filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Cory J. Geyer waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022, filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Brandon M.A. Cottrill waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022, filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shane J. Hardymon. Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio waiver sent on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/4/2022, filed on behalf of Shane J. Hardymon (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Helen K. Sudhoff filed on behalf of Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio, Brandon M.A. Cottrill, Tyson Estrada, Cory J. Geyer, Scott M. Kent, Kent Rachel, Daniel J. Williamson. (Sudhoff, Helen) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Stephanie L. Schoolcraft filed on behalf of Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio, Brandon M.A. Cottrill, Tyson Estrada, Cory J. Geyer, Scott M. Kent, Kent Rachel, Daniel J. Williamson. (Schoolcraft, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 Amended complaint against All Defendants. Filed by Shane J Hardymon. (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio, Brandon Cottrill, John Doe, Tyson Estrada, Cory Geyer, Scott M. Kent, Kent Rachel, Daniel J Williamson. Filing fee paid $402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11405261. Filed by Shane J Hardymon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sremack, Rebecca) |
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.