Morgan v. Social Security Administration
Jemiel Morgan |
Social Security Administration |
1:2022cv00881 |
May 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Bridget Meehan Brennan |
Jonathan D Greenberg |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 425 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 24, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Lisa) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 24, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Social Security Administration answer due 8/24/2022. Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 7/21/22.(D,Ky) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 5/27/22. (D,Ky) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 5/27/22.(D,Ky) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,KS) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Compliance filed by Jemiel Morgan. (Braun, Katherine) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jemiel Morgan. (Braun, Katherine) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Jemiel Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council denial) (Braun, Katherine) |
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (M,KS) |
Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan assigned to case. (M,KS) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (M,KS) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan on 05/26/2022. (M,KS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morgan v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jemiel Morgan | |
Represented By: | Katherine M. Braun |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.