Roy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Somnath Dandapat Roy
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2022cv00918
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: William H Baughman
Referring Judge: Charles Esque Fleming
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2022 Filing 6 Consent of the parties to this case being transferred to the docket of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. for further proceedings. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 7/25/2022. (S,SR)
July 25, 2022 Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. assigned to case pursuant to consent. Judge Charles Esque Fleming terminated. Related document(s) #6 . (R,AP)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order setting procedural schedule as follows: Plaintiff's brief on merits due 08/23/22, Defendant's brief on merits due 09/22/22, Plaintiff's reply, if any, due 10/06/22, Joint certification of meet & confer due 10/20/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 07/22/22.(M,MT)
July 21, 2022 Filing 4 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Johnson, Lisa)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 06/02/22. (M,MT)
June 2, 2022 Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI)
June 2, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11449547. Filed by Somnath Dandapat Roy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Shifrin, Debra)
June 2, 2022 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 6/2/2022. (L,MI)
June 2, 2022 Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (L,MI)
June 2, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI)
June 2, 2022 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Somnath Dandapat Roy
Represented By: Debra S. Shifrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?