Ucic v. ABM Parking Services, Inc. et al
Lynne Ucic |
ABM Parking Services, Inc. and ABM Industry Groups, LLC |
1:2022cv00946 |
June 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Patricia A Gaughan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) (A)(i) filed by Lynne Ucic. (Lang, William) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Lynne Ucic. ABM Industry Groups, LLC waiver sent on 6/7/2022, answer due 8/8/2022 filed on behalf of Lynne Ucic (Lang, William) |
Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Lynne Ucic. ABM Parking Services, Inc. waiver sent on 6/7/2022, answer due 8/8/2022 filed on behalf of Lynne Ucic (Lang, William) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided, and were not issued. (L,MI) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11456154. Filed by Lynne Ucic. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Lang, William) |
Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.