Montague v. City of Cleveland et al
| Vincent Montague |
| City City of Cleveland, Safety Director Karrie Howard, Bruce Cutlip, City of Cleveland and Timothy C. Maffo-Judd |
| 1:2022cv00966 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon City of Cleveland, Bruce Cutlip, Karrie Howard and Timothy C. Maffo-Judd. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Vincent Montague. Related document(s) #1 . (McNeal, Christopher) (Main Document flattened and replaced on 6/7/2022) (S,HR). |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against City of Cleveland, Bruce Cutlip, Karrie Howard, Timothy Maffo-Judd. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11456843.. Filed by Vincent Montague. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (McNeal, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
