Feagin v. Mansfield Police Department et al
| Ulysses Lee Feagin |
| Mansfield Police Department, Officer Jordan Moore, Officer Mark Boggs, Oficer Clay Blair and John and Jane Doe |
| 1:2022cv01201 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Clay Blair, Mark Boggs, Mansfield Police Department, Jordan Moore. (Lute, Melvin) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Complaint: Corrected Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Ulysses Lee Feagin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (M,CE) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ulysses Lee Feagin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate, #2 Inmate Demand Statement). (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Civil Rights Complaint with jury demand against Mansfield Police Department, Jordan Moore, Mark Boggs, Clay Blair, John and Jane Doe. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ulysses Lee Feagin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285, #4 Envelope). (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (H,Ch) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
