Partridge v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court et al
| Nicholas Denard Partridge |
| Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court and Judge Brian Corrigan |
| 1:2022cv01573 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Denard Partridge. Related document(s) #1 . (D,Ju)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint of Fraud with jury demand (Unsigned) against Judge Brian Corrigan, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. Indicated that this case may be related to case number 961582 in Cuyahoga Common Pleas Courthouse. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Nicholas Denard Partridge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 envelope) (D,Ju)
|
|
Copy of #1 Complaint #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, blank summons and USM-285 forms mailed to Nicholas Denard Partridge at 1624 Honeysuckle Path, Conyers, GA 30012 on 09/07/2022. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (D,Ju)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (D,Ju)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (D,Ju)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
