Hiroki v. Hiroki
| Tomokazu Hiroki |
| Heather Hiroki |
| 1:2022cv01614 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Answer to #4 Amended Complaint filed by Heather Hiroki. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Heather Hiroki, #2 Exhibit 1 to Affidavit - Letter, #3 Exhibit 2 to Affidavit - Photo, #4 Exhibit 3 to Affidavit - Photo, #5 Exhibit 4 to Affidavit - Photo, #6 Exhibit 5 to Affidavit - Photo, #7 Exhibit 6 to Affidavit - Photo, #8 Exhibit 7 to Affidavit - Photo, #9 Exhibit 8 to Affidavit - Text, #10 Exhibit 9 to Affidavit - Texts)(Sayre, John) Modified text on 11/3/2022 (S,SR).
|
|
Filing 5
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Tomokazu Hiroki. Heather Hiroki waiver sent on 9/12/2022, answer due 11/11/2022 filed on behalf of Tomokazu Hiroki (Early, Heather)
|
|
Filing 4
Amended complaint for return of children pursuant to the International Child Abduction Remedies Act(42 USC 11601, et seq.), Preliminary Injunction, and Monetary Damages against Heather Hiroki. Filed by Tomokazu Hiroki. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - birth certificates, #2 Exhibit 2 - Japan Civil Code, #3 Exhibit 3 - Affidavit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons) (Early, Heather) Modified text on 9/12/2022 (S,SR).
|
|
Filing 3
Order: The #1 complaint is hereby placed UNDER SEAL. Plaintiff shall refile a complaint that is consistent with Local Rule 8.1(a)(2) within 14 days of this order. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 9/12/2022. (S,SR)
|
|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Heather Hiroki. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (H,Ch)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint for return of children pursuant to the International Child Abduction Remedies Act(42 USC 11601, et seq.), Preliminary Injunction, and Monetary Damages against Heather Hiroki. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11610377. Filed by Tomokazu Hiroki. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - birth certificates, #2 Exhibit 2 - Japan Civil Code, #3 Exhibit 3 - Affidavit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons). (Early, Heather)
|
|
Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (H,Ch)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (H,Ch)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hiroki v. Hiroki | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tomokazu Hiroki | |
| Represented By: | Melinda S. Kaufman |
| Represented By: | Heather Early |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Heather Hiroki | |
| Represented By: | John D. Sayre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
