Stormborn Technologies LLC v. Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc.
Stormborn Technologies LLC |
Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. |
1:2022cv01718 |
September 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Report on the Determination [Closing] of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120). (Attachments: #1 Order) (M,CE) |
Filing 9 Order of Case Dismissal without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/7/2022. (P,K) |
Filing 8 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) without Prejudice filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 7 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) without Prejudice filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 6 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. on 9/30/2022, filed on behalf of Stormborn Technologies, LLC. Related document(s) #5 . (R,AP) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. c/o Thomas H. Richards, Registered Agent placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt #7020 0090 0001 4429 2220. (R,AP) |
Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,MI) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 2 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 1 Complaint for infringement of patent with jury demand against Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11632724. Filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - USRE44199E, #2 Exhibit B - Schilling Declaration w Exhibits, #3 Exhibit C - Claim Chart, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons). (Wernow, Howard) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,MI) |
This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stormborn Technologies LLC v. Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stormborn Technologies LLC | |
Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sigmatek U.S. Automation, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.