Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michael Jermaine Jackson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv01789 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Unopposed Motion for extension of time until December 12, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Staley Rafferty, Cara)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until December 12, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Commissioner of Social Security answer due 12/12/2022. Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 12/2/2022.(K,L)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 10/6/2022.(K,L)
|
|
Filing 4
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (R,AP)
|
|
Filing 3
Status Report filed by Michael Jermaine Jackson. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Michael Jermaine Jackson. (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Michael Jermaine Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wicklund, Edward)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (R,AP)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (R,AP)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 10/5/2022. (R,AP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Jermaine Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Cara Staley Rafferty |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
