Hood v. Annett Holdings, Inc. et al
| Ortavious Hood |
| Annett Holdings, Inc., National Star Services, Inc. and Annett Holdings, Inc. doing business as TMC Transportation |
| 1:2022cv01803 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Acknowledgement of receipt of original state court record received on 12/1/2022 from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. Related document(s) #8 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (H,Ch) |
| Filing 8 State court documents received from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV22968242. Original record returned to Cuyahoga County Court with acknowledgement of receipt enclosed. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Cuyahoga County Court, #2 Envelope) (L,Br) |
Order [non-document] The Court has been advised by the parties that they have settled this matter. Therefore, all future scheduled dates are cancelled. The parties are ordered to file an entry of dismissal within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order or the Court will issue an order dismissing the case. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/14/2022. (P,K)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Substitution of Counsel removing attorney Rocco J. Screnci and adding attorney Daniel S. Dubow filed by on behalf of Ortavious Hood. (Dubow, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Annett Holdings, Inc.. (Krol, Jonathan) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's Motion for leave to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint, until November 11, 2022. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/13/2022.(P,K)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for 28 day extension of time To Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Annett Holdings, Inc.. (Krol, Jonathan) Modified on 10/17/2022 to reflect extension request (L,Br). |
| Filing 4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by Defendant National Star Services, Inc. (Haring, Andrew) Modified on 10/12/2022 to reflect request in motion (P,K). |
|
Order [non-document] granting #4 Defendant National Star Services, Inc's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until 11/11/2022. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/12/2022.(P,K)
|
|
Filing 3
Order [non-document] This matter was removed to this Court on 10/7/2022. For the convenience of the Court, and by no later than 10/24/2022, the parties are directed to refile herein any motions that were previously filed in state court and which remained pending at the time of removal. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/10/2022. (P,K)
|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas, case number CV22968242 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-11654200. Filed by Annett Holdings, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit C - Service documents from Cuyahoga County Docket, #5 Exhibit D - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal). (Krol, Jonathan) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
