Bird v. Cargill, Incorporated
| David Bird |
| Cargill, Incorporated |
| 1:2022cv02035 |
| November 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| David A Ruiz |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #5 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Jason A. Cabrera for Cargill, Incorporated. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge David A. Ruiz on 12/13/2022. (G,CA)
|
|
Filing 5
Motion for attorney Jason A. Cabrera to Appear Pro Hac Vice |
| Filing 4 Answer and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, filed by Cargill, Incorporated. (Grendell, Henry) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Cargill, Incorporated on 11/21/2022, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of David Bird. Related document(s) #2 . (Mc,K) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Cargill, Incorporated placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt #7020 0640 0000 4643 3140. (R,AP) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Cargill, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,AP) |
| Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for damages with jury demand against Cargill, Incorporated. Filing fee paid, $402.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-11708937. Filed by David Bird. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Right To Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Wade-Kilts, Claire) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bird v. Cargill, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Bird | |
| Represented By: | Claire I. Wade-Kilts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cargill, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Jason A. Cabrera |
| Represented By: | Henry G. Grendell |
| Represented By: | James M. Drozdowski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
