Baldwin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Donna R. Baldwin |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv02077 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| James E Grimes |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Initial Disclosures Notice of Social Security Number Disclosure filed by Donna R. Baldwin. Related document(s) #4 , #1 .(Johnson, Casaundra)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (M,MT)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. on 11/22/22. (M,MT)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. on 11/22/22.(M,MT)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (B,DL)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Donna R. Baldwin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AO 239 Application to Proceed In forma Pauperis)(Johnson, Casaundra)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Donna R. Baldwin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285 Attorney General of US, #4 USM-285 Office of Regional Chief Counsel, #5 USM-285 Civil Process Clerk US Attorney) (Johnson, Casaundra)
|
|
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (B,DL)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (B,DL)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 11/17/2022. (B,DL)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (B,DL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baldwin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donna R. Baldwin | |
| Represented By: | Casaundra L. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
