Greenberger et al v. Bober, Markey, Fedorovich & Company
Jordan Greenberger, Lindsey Greenberger and J. Greenberger, PLLC |
Bober, Markey, Fedorovich & Company |
1:2022cv02087 |
November 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
J Philip Calabrese |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Bober, Markey, Fedorovich & Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (H,Ch) |
Filing 2 Motion for attorney Jordan Greenberger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 14660142116, Motion E-Filing Privileges and Motion to appear remotely for any Pre-Trial appearance filed by Jordan Greenberger, Lindsey Greenberger, J. Greenberger, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jordan Greenberger). (H,Ch) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Bober, Markey, Fedorovich & Company. Filing fee paid $402.00. Receipt # 14660142115. Filed by Jordan Greenberger, Lindsey Greenberger and J. Greenberger, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Envelope). (H,Ch) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (H,Ch) |
Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.