Williams v. Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services
Raina Williams |
Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services |
1:2022cv02110 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Christopher A Boyko |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Order [non-document]granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until January 31, 2023 to answer. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/22/2022.(L,Ja) |
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until January 31, 2023 to answer filed by Defendant Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services. Related document(s) #1 . (Stewart, Michael) |
Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Michael J. Stewart filed by on behalf of Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services. (Stewart, Michael) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services on 12/5/2022, filed on behalf of Raina Williams. Related document(s) #2 . (R,AP) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services on 12/6/2022, filed on behalf of Raina Williams. Related document(s) #2 . (F,ML) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt #7022 1670 0001 9172 1693. (R,AP) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services Office of General Counsel placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt #7022 1670 0001 9172 1709. (R,AP) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services (two addresses). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI) |
Filing 1 Complaint for damages and reinstatement with jury demand against Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11722384. Filed by Raina Williams. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Right to Sue). (Degraffinried, Shashelia) |
Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raina Williams | |
Represented By: | Daniel S. Dubow |
Represented By: | Kevin A. Buryanek |
Represented By: | Shashelia Degraffinried |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cuyahoga County Job and Family Services | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Stewart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.