Crowell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Stephen Crowell
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv02140
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong
Referring Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 13, 2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Asher, Ruchi)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]granting Defendant's #4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until February 13, 2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint Commissioner of the Social Security Administration answer due 2/13/2023. Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 1/25/2023.(K,L)
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 12/7/2022. (K,L)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Mc,K)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11729289.. Filed by Stephen Crowell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Margolius, Marcia)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (Mc,K)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (Mc,K)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (Mc,K)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/29/2022. (Mc,K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crowell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Crowell
Represented By: Marcia W. Margolius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?