Dornan v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Kyle R Dornan and Kyle R. Dornan
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv02244
Filed: December 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Referring Judge: Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 12/14/2022. (K,L)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (H,Ch)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Kyle R Dornan. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Kyle R Dornan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shifrin, Debra)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong on 12/14/2022.(K,L)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 12/14/2022. (H,Ch)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (H,Ch)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (H,Ch)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (H,Ch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dornan v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle R Dornan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle R. Dornan
Represented By: Debra S. Shifrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?