Petersen v. Ohio State Highway Patrol Chardon Post 28, et al
Randall W. Petersen |
Ohio State Highway Patrol Chardon Post 28, Ohio Department of Public Safety and Ohio State Highway Patrol |
1:2022cv02300 |
December 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Patricia A Gaughan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Case Management Order: Case Management Conference was held on 2/16/23. Case is assigned to the standard track. Case is not suitable for Mediation/Settlement Conference at this time. Non-expert discovery shall be completed on or before 7/15/23. Expert reports shall be exchanged on or before N/A for party with burden of proof & N/A for Rebuttal and Expert Discovery shall be completed on or before N/A. Pleadings shall be amended without leave of Court and new parties shall be joined on or before 3/20/23. Dispositive Motions shall be filed on or before 8/15/23. Telephonic Status Conference is set for 5/2/23 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will initiate the call with attorneys only. However, the parties must be available for immediate contact. Counsel shall confer within three business days of any scheduled conference to discuss outstanding issues and respective positions as to settlement. Counsel shall provide to the Court three business days prior to the conference a joint Status Report or confidential individual Status Reports describing the status of discovery, settlement positions, and issues to be addressed. The Status Report(s) need not be filed, but may be delivered via e-mail at Gaughan_Chambers@ohnd.uscourts.gov. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/16/23. (LC,S) Time: 30 mins. |
Filing 7 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Defendants. (Palumbo, Marissa) |
Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Randall W. Petersen. Ohio Department of Public Safety waiver sent on 1/5/2023, answer due 3/6/2023 filed on behalf of Randall W. Petersen (Myers, John) |
Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference set on 2/16/2023 at 09:15 AM to be held telephonically by Hon. Patricia A. Gaughan. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/05/23. (D,Ma) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance of Co-Counsel by David B. Stouffer filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Stouffer, David) |
Filing 3 Attorney Appearance of Lead Counsel by Marissa J. Palumbo filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Palumbo, Marissa) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Ohio Department of Public Safety, Ohio State Highway Patrol and Ohio State Highway Patrol Chardon Post 28. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Ohio State Highway Patrol, Chardon Post 28. Filing fee paid $402.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-11764769. Filed by Randall W Petersen. (Attachments: #1 Charge of Discrimination, #2 Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons - OSHP Chardon Post, #5 Summons - ODPS, #6 Summons - OSHP). (Myers, John) |
Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.