Biton v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
| David Biton |
| The Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Cleveland Clinic Foundation |
| 1:2022cv02302 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David Biton. Cleveland Clinic Foundation waiver sent on 1/9/2023, answer due 3/10/2023 filed on behalf of David Biton (Buryanek, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 First Amended complaint for damages and reinstatement against Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Filed by David Biton. (Buryanek, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Cleveland Clinic Foundation. (two addresses). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (L,MI) |
| Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for damages and reinstatement with jury demand against Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11765223. Filed by David Biton. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Right to Sue). (Buryanek, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
