Walsh v. Fawaky Burst South Euclid, LLC, et al.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Walsh v. Fawaky Burst South Euclid, LLC, et al.

Walsh v. Fawaky Burst South Euclid, LLC, et al.

Case Number:	1:2022mc00035
Filed:	September 22, 2022
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	No cause code entered

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 22, 2022	Filing 3 Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Petitioner Secretary of Labor's 1 Petition to Compel Respondents to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum. The Court finds Respondents in contempt of Court and compels Respon dents to fully comply with Petitioner's subpoena on or before 10/5/2022. If, by such date, Respondents have not fully complied with Petitioner's subpoena, the Court will issue a warrant for the arrest of Respondent Muhammed Edwards. It is ordered that (1) Petitioner serves Respondents with an electronic copy of this Order. (2) The Clerk of Court mails Respondents a copy of this Order. (3) On or before 10/5/2022, Respondents fully comply with Petitioner's subpoena. (4) On or be fore 10/5/2022, Petitioner informs the Court whether or not it has received full compliance from Respondents regarding the subpoena. If necessary, Petitioner may include in this status report a request for the exact number of days that it will need t o review any documents and records that Respondents may have produced. (5) If Respondents fail to fully comply with Petitioner's subpoena on or before 10/5/2022, the Court will issue a warrant for the arrest of Respondent Muhammed Edwards. (6) The statute of limitations under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 255, is tolled from 1/21/2022 until Petitioner informs the Court that it has received Respondents' full compliance with its subpoena. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/22/2022. (JLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 22, 2022

Filing 3 Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Petitioner Secretary of Labor's 1 Petition to Compel Respondents to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum. The Court finds Respondents in contempt of Court and compels Respon dents to fully comply with Petitioner's subpoena on or before 10/5/2022. If, by such date, Respondents have not fully complied with Petitioner's subpoena, the Court will issue a warrant for the arrest of Respondent Muhammed Edwards. It is ordered that (1) Petitioner serves Respondents with an electronic copy of this Order. (2) The Clerk of Court mails Respondents a copy of this Order. (3) On or before 10/5/2022, Respondents fully comply with Petitioner's subpoena. (4) On or be fore 10/5/2022, Petitioner informs the Court whether or not it has received full compliance from Respondents regarding the subpoena. If necessary, Petitioner may include in this status report a request for the exact number of days that it will need t o review any documents and records that Respondents may have produced. (5) If Respondents fail to fully comply with Petitioner's subpoena on or before 10/5/2022, the Court will issue a warrant for the arrest of Respondent Muhammed Edwards. (6) The statute of limitations under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 255, is tolled from 1/21/2022 until Petitioner informs the Court that it has received Respondents' full compliance with its subpoena. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/22/2022. (JLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walsh v. Fawaky Burst South Euclid, LLC, et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?