George v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rachel George |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2023cv00079 |
| January 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Darrell A Clay |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Staley Rafferty, Cara)
|
|
Order [non-document] On January 20, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to supplement her request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee. Plaintiff was given until February 3, 2023 to do so. Plaintiff did neither by the required deadline, but did pay the filing fee on February 6, 2023. Sua sponte, I hereby extend the deadline for Plaintiff to comply with my prior order [ECF #4 ] to February 6, 2023, deem the filing fee as received timely, and deny as moot Plaintiff's previously-filed #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 2/22/2023. (R,Ke)
|
|
Financial Transaction in the amount of $402.00 received from Shifrin Newman LLC. Receipt # 8957. (E,CK)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant is granted a maximum of 60 calendar days after notice of the complaint is served on it to file the certified transcript of the administrative record. Plaintiff must file its Brief on the Merits within 45 calendar days of the filing of the Administrative Transcript. If Plaintiff's Brief on the Merits is not filed within 45 calendar days after the Administrative Transcript, the case may be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution without further notice. Defendant's Brief on the Merits must be filed within 30 calendar days thereafter. Plaintiff's Reply Brief, if any, shall be filed within 14 days of filing of Defendant's Brief. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 1/20/2023. (R,Ke)
|
|
Filing 4
Order to supplement IFP or pay the filing fee by 2/3/2023. re #2 . Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 1/20/2023. (R,Ke)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (F,ML)
|
|
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (F,ML)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (F,ML)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (F,ML)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 01/17/2023. (F,ML)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Rachel George. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee paid on 2/6/2023. Filed by Rachel George. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shifrin, Debra) Modified on 2/8/2023 (E,CK).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
