Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Tracey Jane Graham |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2023cv00148 |
| January 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Amanda M Knapp |
| David A Ruiz |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Staley Rafferty, Cara) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (P,G) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: The transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1 and this Order. Compliance with all requirements set forth in this Order is expected. Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 1/27/2023. (P,G) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 1/27/2023.(P,G)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Tracey Jane Graham. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Tracey Jane Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Shifrin, Debra) |
| Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (L,MI) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/25/2023. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tracey Jane Graham | |
| Represented By: | Debra S. Shifrin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Cara Staley Rafferty |
| Represented By: | SSA-Office of General Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
