Frederick v. Rockwell Automation, Inc.
| Pamela Frederick |
| Rockwell Automation, Inc. doing business as Rockwell Automation (USA) |
| 1:2023cv00258 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Motion to stay Proceedings, Motion to Compel Arbitration with memorandum in support filed by Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Arbitration Agreement)(Giffen, Karen). Added Motion to compel arbitration on 3/30/2023 (M,CE). |
| Filing 6 Proposed Order filed by Rockwell Automation, Inc.. Related document(s) #5 . (Giffen, Karen) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until March 30, 2023 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc. Related document(s) #1 . (Giffen, Karen) |
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Karen L. Giffen filed by on behalf of Rockwell Automation, Inc.. (Giffen, Karen) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Rockwell Automation, Inc. answer due 3/30/2023. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 3/9/2023. (S,SR)
|
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Rockwell Automation, Inc. on 2/17/2023, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Pamela Frederick Related document(s) #2 . (F,ML) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Rockwell Automation, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7022 1670 0001 9172 1105. (F,AW) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for damages and injunctive relief with jury demand against Rockwell Automation, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11833128. Filed by Pamela Frederick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Rockwell Automation, Inc.) (Wido, Christopher) |
| Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frederick v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pamela Frederick | |
| Represented By: | Christopher P. Wido |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rockwell Automation, Inc. doing business as Rockwell Automation (USA) | |
| Represented By: | Karen L. Giffen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
