Waseleski v. City of Brooklyn et al
| Philip M. Waseleski |
| City of Brooklyn, Scott Mielke, Tony Aftim, Kyle Pitts, Mike Spisak, James J. McDonnell, Jane and John Does 1 through 10 and Jane and John Does |
| 1:2023cv00548 |
| March 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Request to grant access and privileges for e-filing filed by Plaintiff Philip M. Waseleski. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence from PACER, #2 Registration for Electronic Filing)(F,AW)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Philip M. Waseleski. (Attachments: #1 Financial Disclosure/Fee-waiver Affidavit and Proposed Order)(F,AW)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint for violation of civil rights (42 U.S.C. 1983) with jury demand against City of Brooklyn, Scott Mielke, Tony Aftim, Kyle Pitts, Mike Spisak, James J. McDonnell and Jane and John Does. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Philip M. Waseleski. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (F,AW)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (F,AW)
|
|
Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (F,AW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
