Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Tommy Shaw
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2023cv00620
Filed: March 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Referring Judge: Amanda M Knapp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Filing 6 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,HR)
March 28, 2023 Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. The transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1 and this Order. Compliance with all requirements set forth in this Order is expected. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 3/28/2023. (S,S)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp on 3/28/2023. (S,S)
March 23, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Ina, Rema)
March 23, 2023 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Tommy Shaw. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia)
March 23, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Tommy Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Margolius, Marcia)
March 23, 2023 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 3/23/2023. (L,MI)
March 23, 2023 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (L,MI)
March 23, 2023 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (L,MI)
March 23, 2023 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (L,MI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tommy Shaw
Represented By: Marcia W. Margolius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: SSA-Office of General Counsel
Represented By: Rema Alberta Ina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?