Holmer et al v. Alcove Ventures, LLC, et al
| Erin Holmer, Melanie Howell and Conita Oakes |
| Alcove Ventures, LLC doing business as Psych360 and Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00747 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Charles Esque Fleming |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Opposition to #7 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and Motion to compel arbitration filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Howell, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Oakes)(Sherman, Bradley) |
| Filing 7 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and Motion to compel arbitration with memorandum in support filed by Alcove Ventures, LLC, Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rocco Coniglio, #2 Coniglio Dec. Exhibit A (Holmer Employment Agreement), #3 Coniglio Dec. Exhibit B (Howell Employment Agreement), #4 Coniglio Dec. Exhibit C (Oakes Employment Agreement))(Rudary, Daniel). Added Motion on 5/17/2023 (S,DM). |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Daniel J. Rudary and Bryan E. Meek filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Rudary, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. c/o Cogency Global,Inc. filed on behalf of Erin Holmer, Conita Oakes, Melanie Howell. Related document(s) #2 . (F,ML) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. on 4/17/2023, filed on behalf of Erin Holmer; Conita Oakes; Melanie Howell. Related document(s) #2 .(F,ML) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Alcove Ventures, LLC on 4/15/2023, filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #2 . (L,Br) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Alcove Ventures, LLC (additional summons issued for service c/o statutory agent), Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. (additional summons issued for service c/o statutory agent). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand Collective Action against Alcove Ventures, LLC, Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11944558.. Filed by Erin Holmer, Conita Oakes, Melanie Howell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Holmer, et al v. Alcove Ventures, LLC, et al, #2 Summons Alcove Ventures, LLC dba Psych 360, #3 Summons Rocco Coniglio - Statutory Agent for Alcove Ventures, #4 Summons Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc., #5 Summons Cogency Global - Statutory Agent for Mindcare Solutions) (Sherman, Bradley) |
| Judge Charles Esque Fleming assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (H,Ch) |
| Service by Clerk. Summonses and Complaint addressed to Alcove Ventures, LLC (c/o Psych360)(Receipt # 7018 3090 0000 1098 2800), Alcove Ventures, LLC (c/o Rocco Coniglio)(Receipt # 7018 3090 0000 1098 2817), Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. (Receipt # 7018 3090 0000 1098 2824), Mindcare Solutions Group, Inc. (c/o Cogency Global, Inc) (Receipt # 7018 3090 0000 1098 2831) placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
