Powers et al v. State of Ohio et al
| Chelsea Powers and Samir Nelson |
| State of Ohio, Dick Ambrose, Hannah F.G. Singerman, Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor, Treasurer of Cuyahoga County Ohio, W. Mona Scott and Gateway Capital Group, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01160 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Patricia A Gaughan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Samir Nelson. (H,Ch)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint 5.5- million dollar claim under 42 U.S. Code Sec. 1983 action for deprivation of civil rights, violation of due process, conspiracy to commit real estate deed fraud, violation of 18 USC sec. 241 & 242, deprivation of rights under color of law, conspiracy against rights, violation of IRS code, wrongful foreclosure, this claim is also for obstruction of the administration of justice with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Samir Nelson and Chelsea Powers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (H,Ch)
|
|
Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (H,Ch)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (H,Ch)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
