Su v. Claddagh Development Group, LLC et al
| Acting Secretary Julie A. Su |
| Claddagh Development Group, LLC and Claddagh Development Group, LLC Employees Savings Trust |
| 1:2023cv01198 |
| June 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Claddagh Development Group, LLC Employees Savings Trust. (H,SP) |
| Filing 4 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Julie A. Su. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Pincus, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance of Additional Counsel of Record by Stephen M. Pincus filed by on behalf of Julie A. Su. (Pincus, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons were provided, no summons were issued. (F,AW) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Claddagh Development Group, LLC, Claddagh Development Group, LLC Employees Savings Trust. Filing fee exempt. Filed by Julie A. Su. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rock, Kenneth) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (F,AW) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (F,AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
