Mitchell, Jr. et al v. WGU Corporation
Plaintiff: Ryan Mitchell, Jr. and Brady Misner
Defendant: WGU Corporation
Case Number: 1:2023cv01332
Filed: July 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act/Junk Fax Prevention Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting the Parties' #8 Joint Motion for extension of time until October 5, 2023 for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Complaint. WGU Corporation answer due 10/5/2023. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 8/31/2023.(R,Sh)
August 30, 2023 Filing 8 Joint Motion for extension of time until October 5, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to Complaint filed by Defendant WGU Corporation. Related document(s) #1 . (Thomassen, Benjamin)
August 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 31, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond. WGU Corporation answer due 8/31/2023. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 8/1/2023.(R,Sh)
July 31, 2023 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 31, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond filed by Defendant WGU Corporation. Related document(s) #1 . (Thomassen, Benjamin)
July 31, 2023 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by WGU Corporation. (Thomassen, Benjamin)
July 28, 2023 Filing 5 Return of Service by personal service executed upon WGU Corporation on 7/11/2023, filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Donelon, Brendan)
July 27, 2023 Filing 4 Motion for attorney Ben Thomassen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12106131, filed by Defendant WGU Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Ben Thomassen, #2 Proposed Order)(Spellacy, Leo)
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Benjamin S. Thomassen for WGU Corporation. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #4 ). Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 7/27/2023.(R,Sh)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Daniel W. Craig for Brady Misner, Daniel W. Craig for Ryan Mitchell, Jr. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #3 ). Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 7/26/2023.(R,Sh)
July 25, 2023 Filing 3 Motion for attorney Daniel W. Craig to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee paid, $120.00 Receipt number 146635. Filed by Plaintiff Ryan Mitchell, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel W. Craig) (R,AP)
July 10, 2023 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon WGU Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (F,AW)
July 10, 2023 Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (F,AW)
July 10, 2023 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (F,AW)
July 7, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against WGU Corporation. Filing fee paid $402.00, receipt number AOHNDC-12076382. Filed by Ryan Mitchell, Jr., Brady Misner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Donelon, Brendan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell, Jr. et al v. WGU Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Mitchell, Jr.
Represented By: Brendan J. Donelon
Represented By: Daniel W. Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brady Misner
Represented By: Brendan J. Donelon
Represented By: Daniel W. Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WGU Corporation
Represented By: Benjamin S. Thomassen
Represented By: Leo M. Spellacy, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?