Cross-Blancke v. Flaiz et al
| Deborah Cross-Blancke |
| James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray and Oscar E. Rodriguez |
| 1:2023cv01568 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray. Related document(s) #1 . (Quinlan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
Attorney Appearance by Michael P. Quinlan and Kenneth E. Smith filed by on behalf of James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray. (Quinlan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued over the counter to pro se Plaintiff for service upon James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray, Oscar E. Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,AP)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights against James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray, Oscar E. Rodriguez. Filing fee paid, $402.00. Receipt #146938. Filed by Deborah Cross-Blancke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (R,AP)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (R,AP)
|
|
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (R,AP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
