National Court Reporters, Inc. v. Langston et al
| National Court Reporters, Inc. |
| Lee F. Langston, Cory J. Smith and U.S. Department of Justice |
| 1:2023cv01598 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Lee F. Langston, Cory J. Smith, U.S. Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(DeCaro, Sara) |
| Filing 3 Motion for extension of time until October 16, 2023 to answer or otherwise plead filed by Lee F. Langston, Cory J. Smith, U.S. Department of Justice. (DeCaro, Sara) |
Order [non-document] granting #3 Defendants' Motion for extension of time until October 16, 2023 to answer or otherwise plead. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 8/17/2023.(P,K)
|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,AP) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV 23 982724 . Filing fee exempt. Filed by U.S. Department of Justice, Cory J. Smith, Lee F. Langston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (DeCaro, Sara) |
|
Order [non-document] This matter was removed to this Court on 8/16/2023. For the convenience of the Court, and by no later than 8/30/2023, the parties are directed to refile herein any motions that were previously filed in state court and which remained pending at the time of removal. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 8/16/2023. (P,K)
|
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP) |
|
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Courts immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 8/16/2023. (P,K)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
