Maxey v. Cuyahoga County Jail et al
Derrick S. Maxey |
Cuyahoga County Jail, Aramark Services and Trinity Services Group |
1:2023cv01604 |
August 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
David A Ruiz |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Supplement - Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint filed by Derrick S. Maxey. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (R,AP) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Derrick S. Maxey (incomplete, missing page 4). (Attachments: #1 Cashier's Statement). (H,Ch) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Cuyahoga County Jail, Aramark Services and Trinity Services Group. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Derrick S. Maxey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (H,Ch) |
Copy of #1 Complaint, Blank Civil Cover Sheet and Blank Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs mailed to Derrick S. Maxey, 802-377 at Lake Erie Correctional Institution, 501 Thompson Road, Conneaut, OH 44030 on 8/17/2023. Related document(s) #1 . (H,Ch) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (H,Ch) |
Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.