Handson Equine, LLC v. Boss Pet Products, Inc., et al.
| Handson Equine, LLC |
| Boss Pet Products, Inc. and Petedge, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01821 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| David A Ruiz |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #10 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Ian R. Walsworth for Handson Equine, LLC. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge David A. Ruiz on 11/14/2023. (G,CA)
|
| Filing 10 Motion for attorney Ian R. Walsworth to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12270190, filed by Plaintiff Handson Equine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Kern, David) |
| Filing 9 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Handson Equine, LLC. (Kern, David) |
| Notice of Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Local Rule 3.13(c) requires the filing of an updated #AO120 Patent and Trademark Report Form when an Amended Complaint is filed that modifies Patent or Trademark Nos. (Related Document: #5 ). Amended AO120 due by 11/06/2023. (Mc,K) |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR (duplicate of #7 ) - Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Boss Pet Products, Inc. and Petedge, Inc. (B,DL) Modified as a filing error on 10/27/2023 (B,DL). |
| Filing 7 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Boss Pet Products, Inc., Petedge, Inc. (F,AW) |
| Filing 6 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Handson Equine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summon Forms For Both Defendants)(Kern, David) |
| Filing 5 First Amended complaint against Handson Equine, LLC. Filed by Handson Equine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. D893111, #2 Exhibit Assused Products, #3 Exhibit Correspondence from PetEdge) (Kern, David) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided, no summons issued. (R,AP) |
| Judge David A. Ruiz assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (R,AP) |
| This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (R,AP) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Handson Equine, LLC. (Mc,K) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Handson Equine LLC. (Kern, David) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Boss Pet Products, Inc., Petedge, Inc. Filing fee paid $402.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12186481. Filed by Handson Equine, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. D858906, #2 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. D893111, #3 Exhibit Accused Products, #4 Exhibit Letter from PetEdge, #5 Exhibit Form AO 120, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kern, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
