Sorensen v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
| David Sorensen |
| Indivior, Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., MonoSol Rx, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC and Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd. |
| 1:2023cv01855 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of withdrawal of counsel Ildiko A. Szucs filed by David Sorensen. (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
Order [non-document] On September 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. No. #5 ) to the Court's Show Cause Order (Doc. No. #3 ) as well as an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. #4 ). Plaintiff has satisfied the Court's Show Cause Order. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/2/2023. (P,K)
|
| Filing 5 Response to Show Cause Order filed by David Sorensen. Related document(s) #3 . (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
| Filing 4 Amended complaint against Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior, Inc., MonoSol Rx, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd.. Filed by David Sorensen. (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
|
Filing 3
Order to Show Cause. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Court orders Plaintiff to (a) identify the citizenship of all of Defendants MonoSol LLC's and Reckitt Benckiser LLC's members at the time the Complaint was filed; and (b) show cause why the instant case should not be dismissed sua sponte for lack of complete diversity of citizenship because Defendant Indivior Solutions, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Ohio. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 9/26/2023. (P,K)
|
|
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Courts immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 9/25/2023. (P,K)
|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior, Inc., MonoSol Rx, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12196002. Filed by David Sorensen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
