Slovenkay et al. v. Lakeland Community College
| richard SLOVENKAY and Sarah Phillips |
| Lakeland Community College |
| 1:2023cv01880 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Marginal Entry Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/1/23 approving the dismissal without prejudice. re #3 Notice (T,A)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) without prejudice filed by Sarah Phillips, Richard Slovenkay. (Wiest, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Lakeland Community College. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (H,Ch) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Class Action Complaint and demand for jury trial against Lakeland Community College. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12199364. Filed by Richard Slovenkay, Sarah Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Wiest, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
