Kanaga et al. v. Monsanto Company
| Glenn Kanaga and Darcie Kanaga |
| Monsanto Company |
| 1:2023cv01882 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from Northern District of Ohio has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:23-cv-05563, filed 10/27/2023. Related document(s) #3 . (R,AP) |
| Filing 3 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO 426) by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In re: MDL No. 2741 Roundup Products Liability Litigation. Case transferred to Northern District of California and assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. (M,CE) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and was not issued. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Short Form Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12200710. Filed by Glenn Kanaga. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carlin, William) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (H,Ch) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
