DeSimone v. Brookpark Freeway Lanes LLC
| Mike DeSimone |
| Brookpark Freeway Lanes, LLC doing business as RollHouse Entertainment |
| 1:2023cv01999 |
| October 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 Americans with Disabilities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Matthew T. Anderson filed by on behalf of Mike DeSimone. (Anderson, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Mike DeSimone. Brookpark Freeway Lanes, LLC waiver sent on 10/13/2023, answer due 12/12/2023 filed on behalf of Mike DeSimone (Anderson, Kyle) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and was not issued. (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Brookpark Freeway Lanes LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12225266. Filed by Mike DeSimone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Kyle) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/13/2023. (P,K)
|
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeSimone v. Brookpark Freeway Lanes LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mike DeSimone | |
| Represented By: | Kyle T. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Matthew T. Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brookpark Freeway Lanes, LLC doing business as RollHouse Entertainment | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
