Schie v. Indivior Inc. et al.
| Jeremy Schie |
| Indivior, Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Monosol RX, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd. and MonoSol Rx, LLC |
| 1:2023cv02024 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| J Philip Calabrese |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (H,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc., MonoSol, LLC, Monosol RX, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12228304.. Filed by Jeremy Schie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Sletvold, Ashlie) |
| Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. (H,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
